Instruction:
# Repository Guidelines

## Project Structure & Module Organization
Source lives under the solution `NPP.SmartSchedue.sln`. `NPP.SmartSchedue.Host` hosts the ASP.NET Core app, with environment settings in `appsettings*.json`, seed scripts in `ConfigCenter` and `InitData`, and static assets in `wwwroot`. Domain services sit in `NPP.SmartSchedue.Api`, organized into `Core` (attributes, constants), `Services` (business logic), and `Repositories` (data access). Shared contracts, DTOs, and interfaces reside in `NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts`; keep cross-project types there. Tests are in `NPP.SmartSchedue.Tests`, with reusable fixtures in `BaseTest` and service-focused integration suites under `Services`.

## Build, Test, and Development Commands
- `dotnet restore NPP.SmartSchedue.sln` restores all project dependencies.
- `dotnet build NPP.SmartSchedue.sln -c Release` validates compilation; use `-c Debug` during local iteration.
- `dotnet run --project NPP.SmartSchedue.Host` boots the API with the default profile; add `--launch-profile Development` when you need local CAP setups.
- `dotnet test NPP.SmartSchedue.Tests/NPP.SmartSchedue.Tests.csproj --logger "trx;LogFileName=test-results.trx"` exercises the xUnit suites and saves artifacts for PR review.

## Coding Style & Naming Conventions
Target .NET 9 defaults: four-space indentation, braces on new lines, and explicit namespaces. Use `PascalCase` for classes, public members, and DTOs, `camelCase` for locals and private fields, and prefix interfaces with `I` as seen in `Api.Contracts`. Suffix asynchronous methods with `Async`, and keep request/response models in the Contracts project. Run `dotnet format` before committing to enforce spacing and using-order consistency.

## Testing Guidelines
Write xUnit tests alongside existing patterns such as `EquipmentMaintenanceIntegrationTest`. Name new files `{Feature}Test.cs` or `{Feature}IntegrationTest.cs`, group helper logic in `BaseTest`, and rely on `Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing` for host bootstrapping. Aim to cover new service paths and repository edge cases; add mocks via Moq where external systems (CAP, RabbitMQ, MySQL) would otherwise be required.

## Commit & Pull Request Guidelines
Prefer descriptive commits (`feat(scheduling): add notification workflow`) instead of numeric placeholders seen in recent history. Bundle related changes, include migration or config adjustments in the same commit, and reference tracking IDs where relevant. Pull requests should outline the change, list manual or automated test evidence, mention configuration impacts (CAP, FreeSql, message queues), and supply screenshots for any UI updates under `wwwroot`.

## Configuration & Environment Notes
Keep secrets out of `appsettings.json`; use user secrets or environment variables for connection strings and CAP brokers. Document any required RabbitMQ or MySQL endpoints in the PR. When adding assets or scripts, mirror the structure under `ConfigCenter`, `InitData`, and `wwwroot` so the publish targets continue copying them correctly.


<user_instructions>

# Repository Guidelines

## Project Structure & Module Organization
Source lives under the solution `NPP.SmartSchedue.sln`. `NPP.SmartSchedue.Host` hosts the ASP.NET Core app, with environment settings in `appsettings*.json`, seed scripts in `ConfigCenter` and `InitData`, and static assets in `wwwroot`. Domain services sit in `NPP.SmartSchedue.Api`, organized into `Core` (attributes, constants), `Services` (business logic), and `Repositories` (data access). Shared contracts, DTOs, and interfaces reside in `NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts`; keep cross-project types there. Tests are in `NPP.SmartSchedue.Tests`, with reusable fixtures in `BaseTest` and service-focused integration suites under `Services`.

## Build, Test, and Development Commands
- `dotnet restore NPP.SmartSchedue.sln` restores all project dependencies.
- `dotnet build NPP.SmartSchedue.sln -c Release` validates compilation; use `-c Debug` during local iteration.
- `dotnet run --project NPP.SmartSchedue.Host` boots the API with the default profile; add `--launch-profile Development` when you need local CAP setups.
- `dotnet test NPP.SmartSchedue.Tests/NPP.SmartSchedue.Tests.csproj --logger "trx;LogFileName=test-results.trx"` exercises the xUnit suites and saves artifacts for PR review.

## Coding Style & Naming Conventions
Target .NET 9 defaults: four-space indentation, braces on new lines, and explicit namespaces. Use `PascalCase` for classes, public members, and DTOs, `camelCase` for locals and private fields, and prefix interfaces with `I` as seen in `Api.Contracts`. Suffix asynchronous methods with `Async`, and keep request/response models in the Contracts project. Run `dotnet format` before committing to enforce spacing and using-order consistency.

## Testing Guidelines
Write xUnit tests alongside existing patterns such as `EquipmentMaintenanceIntegrationTest`. Name new files `{Feature}Test.cs` or `{Feature}IntegrationTest.cs`, group helper logic in `BaseTest`, and rely on `Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing` for host bootstrapping. Aim to cover new service paths and repository edge cases; add mocks via Moq where external systems (CAP, RabbitMQ, MySQL) would otherwise be required.

## Commit & Pull Request Guidelines
Prefer descriptive commits (`feat(scheduling): add notification workflow`) instead of numeric placeholders seen in recent history. Bundle related changes, include migration or config adjustments in the same commit, and reference tracking IDs where relevant. Pull requests should outline the change, list manual or automated test evidence, mention configuration impacts (CAP, FreeSql, message queues), and supply screenshots for any UI updates under `wwwroot`.

## Configuration & Environment Notes
Keep secrets out of `appsettings.json`; use user secrets or environment variables for connection strings and CAP brokers. Document any required RabbitMQ or MySQL endpoints in the PR. When adding assets or scripts, mirror the structure under `ConfigCenter`, `InitData`, and `wwwroot` so the publish targets continue copying them correctly.

</user_instructions>


<environment_context>
  <cwd>C:\GitCode\paiban</cwd>
  <approval_policy>never</approval_policy>
  <sandbox_mode>danger-full-access</sandbox_mode>
  <network_access>enabled</network_access>
  <shell>powershell.exe</shell>
</environment_context>


分析  LinearProgrammingEngine，


Summary: auto


**Locating LinearProgrammingEngine files**


shell

powershell.exe
-NoLogo
-NoProfile
-Command
rg --files -g *LinearProgrammingEngine*


Output: {"output":"NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Opening file for analysis**


Output: {"output":"using System;\nusing System.Collections.Generic;\nusing System.Linq;\nusing System.Threading.Tasks;\nusing Google.OrTools.LinearSolver;\nusing Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;\nusing NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts.Domain.Work;\nusing NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts.Domain.Personnel;\nusing NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts.Services.Integration.Internal;\nusing NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts.Services.Integration.Output;\n\nnamespace NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Services.Integration.Algorithms\n{\n    /// <summary>\n    /// 增强版线性规划引�?- 实现遗传算法中的所有复杂约�?\n    /// 核心功能：三级约束体�?+ 多维度目标优�?+ 完整业务规则支持\n    /// 设计理念：将遗传算法的启发式约束转换为严格的数学约束，实现精确求�?\n    /// 技术架构：Google OR-Tools + 分层约束建模 + 自适应权重优化\n    /// 业务价值：提供数学最优解，替代遗传算法的近似解，提升调度质量\n    /// </summary>\n    public class LinearProgrammingEngine\n    {\n        private readonly ILogger<LinearProgrammingEngine> _logger;\n        private readonly ShiftRuleValidationEngine _shiftRuleEngine;\n        \n        // 求解器配�?- 增强版配置支持复杂约�?\n        private const string SOLVER_TYPE = \"CBC_MIXED_INTEGER_PROGRAMMING\";\n        private const double OPTIMALITY_TOLERANCE = 1e-6;\n        private const int MAX_SOLVER_TIME_SECONDS = 600; // 增加�?0分钟支持复杂约束\n        private const int MAX_CONSTRAINT_COUNT = 50000;   // 最大约束数量限�?\n        \n        // 约束权重配置 - 对应遗传算法的三级约束体�?\n        private const double LEVEL1_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 1000000.0; // Level 1: 基础约束严厉惩罚\n        private const double LEVEL2_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 100000.0;  // Level 2: 组合约束重度惩罚  \n        private const double LEVEL3_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 10000.0;   // Level 3: 业务约束中度惩罚\n        private const double FAIRNESS_REWARD_FACTOR = 1000.0;       // 公平性奖励系�?\n\n        public LinearProgrammingEngine(\n            ILogger<LinearProgrammingEngine> logger,\n            ShiftRuleValidationEngine shiftRuleEngine)\n        {\n            _logger = logger ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(logger));\n            _shiftRuleEngine = shiftRuleEngine ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(shiftRuleEngine));\n        }\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 执行增强版线性规划优�?- 实现遗传算法等价的约束体�?\n        /// 业务流程：构建决策变�?�?三级约束建模 �?多目标优�?�?精确求解 �?解析结果\n        /// 核心创新：将启发式约束转换为线性约束，实现数学最优解\n        /// </summary>\n        public async Task<GlobalOptimizedSolution> OptimizeAsync(GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var stopwatch = System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.StartNew();\n            \n            try\n            {\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"🚀 启动增强版线性规划优�?- 任务数：{TaskCount}，人员数：{PersonnelCount}，预筛选缓存：{CacheSize}\", \n                    context.Tasks.Count, context.AvailablePersonnel.Count, context.PrefilterResults.Count);\n\n                // 第一步：创建高性能求解�?\n                using var solver = CreateAdvancedSolver();\n\n                // 第二步：构建决策变量矩阵 (x[i,j] = 1表示任务i分配给人员j)\n                var decisionVariables = BuildDecisionVariables(solver, context);\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"📊 决策变量构建完成 - 变量数量：{VariableCount}\", decisionVariables.Count);\n\n                // 第三步：构建辅助变量 (支持复杂约束建模)\n                var auxiliaryVariables = BuildAuxiliaryVariables(solver, context, decisionVariables);\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"🔧 辅助变量构建完成 - 辅助变量数量：{AuxCount}\", auxiliaryVariables.Count);\n\n                // 第四步：Level 1 基础约束 - 对应遗传算法的基础约束验证\n                await AddLevel1BasicConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第五步：Level 2 组合约束 - 对应遗传算法的组合约束验�? \n                await AddLevel2CombinationConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第六步：Level 3 业务约束 - 对应遗传算法的业务逻辑约束\n                await AddLevel3BusinessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第七步：公平性约�?- 对应遗传算法的负载均衡机�?\n                AddFairnessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第八步：设置多维度目标函�?- 对应遗传算法的适应度函�?\n                SetEnhancedObjectiveFunction(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第九步：执行求解\n                _logger.LogInformation(\"🔍 开始求解增强版线性规划模�?..\");\n            \n[... omitted 2156 of 2412 lines ...]\n\n                \n                // 检查历史任务人员的分配\n                if (context.PersonnelHistoryTasks.TryGetValue(personnelId, out var historyTask))\n                {\n                    var taskDate = task.WorkOrderDate.Date;\n\n                    if (historyTask.Any(m => m.WorkDate.Date == taskDate))\n                    {\n                        return true;\n                    }\n                }\n                \n                return false; // 人员可用\n            }\n            catch (Exception ex)\n            {\n                _logger.LogWarning(ex, \"⚠ 检查人员不可用性异�?- 任务{TaskId}人员{PersonnelId}，默认为不可�?, \n                    task.Id, personnelId);\n                return true; // 异常情况下保守处理，标记为不可用\n            }\n        }\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 【Ultra think方法】检查人员在指定任务时间是否不可用（异步版本�?\n        /// 【扩展支持】：为未来集成更复杂的不可用性检查逻辑预留接口\n        /// </summary>\n        private async Task<bool> IsPersonnelUnavailableForTaskAsync(WorkOrderEntity task, long personnelId, GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            // 目前直接调用同步版本，保持异步接口以便未来扩�?\n            await Task.CompletedTask;\n            return IsPersonnelUnavailableForTask(task, personnelId, context);\n        }\n\n        #endregion\n    }\n\n    /// <summary>\n    /// 人员任务矩阵 - 支持高效的关联查�?\n    /// </summary>\n    public class PersonnelTaskMatrix\n    {\n        public Dictionary<long, List<WorkOrderEntity>> PersonnelTaskMap { get; set; } = new();\n        public Dictionary<long, List<GlobalPersonnelInfo>> TaskPersonnelMap { get; set; } = new();\n    }\n\n    /// <summary>\n    /// 时间窗口定义\n    /// </summary>\n    public class TimeWindow : IEquatable<TimeWindow>\n    {\n        public DateTime Date { get; set; }\n        public long ShiftId { get; set; }\n        public TimeSpan StartTime { get; set; }\n\n        public bool Equals(TimeWindow other)\n        {\n            if (other == null) return false;\n            return Date.Date == other.Date.Date && \n                   ShiftId == other.ShiftId && \n                   StartTime == other.StartTime;\n        }\n\n        public override bool Equals(object obj) => Equals(obj as TimeWindow);\n        \n        public override int GetHashCode() => HashCode.Combine(Date.Date, ShiftId, StartTime);\n    }\n\n    /// <summary>\n    /// 冲突严重程度枚举\n    /// </summary>\n    public enum ConflictSeverity\n    {\n        None = 0,        // 无冲�?\n        Low = 1,         // 轻微冲突\n        Medium = 2,      // 中等冲突\n        High = 3,        // 严重冲突\n        Critical = 4     // 关键冲突\n    }\n\n    /// <summary>\n    /// WorkOrderEntity扩展方法 - 为LinearProgrammingEngine提供辅助功能\n    /// </summary>\n    public static class WorkOrderEntityExtensions\n    {\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 【深度实现】为验证目的克隆WorkOrderEntity\n        /// 【业务思考】：在线性规划验证过程中，需要模拟分配的临时任务对象\n        /// 【技术要点】：仅复制验证所需的关键字段，避免整体对象克隆的性能开销\n        /// </summary>\n        public static WorkOrderEntity CloneForValidation(this WorkOrderEntity original)\n        {\n            return new WorkOrderEntity\n            {\n                Id = original.Id,\n                ProjectNumber = original.ProjectNumber,\n                ProjectCategory = original.ProjectCategory,\n                ShiftId = original.ShiftId,\n                ShiftCode = original.ShiftCode,\n                ShiftName = original.ShiftName,\n                WorkOrderCode = original.WorkOrderCode,\n                WorkOrderDate = original.WorkOrderDate,\n                Priority = original.Priority,\n                Urgency = original.Urgency,\n                ComplexityLevel = original.ComplexityLevel,\n                EstimatedHours = original.EstimatedHours,\n                Status = original.Status,\n                AssignedPersonnelId = original.AssignedPersonnelId, // 这个将被修改为模拟分配的人员ID\n                // 关联对象也需要复�?\n                ShiftEntity = original.ShiftEntity,\n                ProcessEntity = original.ProcessEntity,\n                WorkOrderFLPersonnels = original.WorkOrderFLPersonnels\n            };\n        }\n    }\n\n    /// <summary>\n    /// 解质量指�?\n    /// </summary>\n    public class SolutionQualityMetrics\n    {\n        public double TaskCompletenessRate { get; set; }\n        public double TimeConflictRate { get; set; }\n        public double LoadBalanceScore { get; set; }\n        public double PersonnelUtilizationRate { get; set; }\n        public double ConstraintSatisfactionRate { get; set; }\n        public List<string> ViolationDetails { get; set; } = new();\n    }\n}","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Preparing analysis plan for large file**

This file is huge, so I'll focus on breaking down the LinearProgrammingEngine by reviewing its structure first, then pinpointing its core responsibilities, and finally evaluating any issues or improvement opportunities. I think setting a clear plan with these steps will help me provide a solid, organized analysis summary.


Explanation: Need a structured pass through the very large engine to summarize behavior and risks.

Skim class layout to map major responsibilities and helpers

Review critical methods for modeling, constraint setup, and objective

Summarize findings, risks, and improvement ideas


Output: Plan updated


**Reviewing class structure overview**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -First 200


Output: {"output":"using System;\nusing System.Collections.Generic;\nusing System.Linq;\nusing System.Threading.Tasks;\nusing Google.OrTools.LinearSolver;\nusing Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;\nusing NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts.Domain.Work;\nusing NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts.Domain.Personnel;\nusing NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts.Services.Integration.Internal;\nusing NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Contracts.Services.Integration.Output;\n\nnamespace NPP.SmartSchedue.Api.Services.Integration.Algorithms\n{\n    /// <summary>\n    /// 增强版线性规划引�?- 实现遗传算法中的所有复杂约�?\n    /// 核心功能：三级约束体�?+ 多维度目标优�?+ 完整业务规则支持\n    /// 设计理念：将遗传算法的启发式约束转换为严格的数学约束，实现精确求�?\n    /// 技术架构：Google OR-Tools + 分层约束建模 + 自适应权重优化\n    /// 业务价值：提供数学最优解，替代遗传算法的近似解，提升调度质量\n    /// </summary>\n    public class LinearProgrammingEngine\n    {\n        private readonly ILogger<LinearProgrammingEngine> _logger;\n        private readonly ShiftRuleValidationEngine _shiftRuleEngine;\n        \n        // 求解器配�?- 增强版配置支持复杂约�?\n        private const string SOLVER_TYPE = \"CBC_MIXED_INTEGER_PROGRAMMING\";\n        private const double OPTIMALITY_TOLERANCE = 1e-6;\n        private const int MAX_SOLVER_TIME_SECONDS = 600; // 增加�?0分钟支持复杂约束\n        private const int MAX_CONSTRAINT_COUNT = 50000;   // 最大约束数量限�?\n        \n        // 约束权重配置 - 对应遗传算法的三级约束体�?\n        private const double LEVEL1_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 1000000.0; // Level 1: 基础约束严厉惩罚\n        private const double LEVEL2_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 100000.0;  // Level 2: 组合约束重度惩罚  \n        private const double LEVEL3_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 10000.0;   // Level 3: 业务约束中度惩罚\n        private const double FAIRNESS_REWARD_FACTOR = 1000.0;       // 公平性奖励系�?\n\n        public LinearProgrammingEngine(\n            ILogger<LinearProgrammingEngine> logger,\n            ShiftRuleValidationEngine shiftRuleEngine)\n        {\n            _logger = logger ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(logger));\n            _shiftRuleEngine = shiftRuleEngine ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(shiftRuleEngine));\n        }\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 执行增强版线性规划优�?- 实现遗传算法等价的约束体�?\n        /// 业务流程：构建决策变�?�?三级约束建模 �?多目标优�?�?精确求解 �?解析结果\n        /// 核心创新：将启发式约束转换为线性约束，实现数学最优解\n        /// </summary>\n        public async Task<GlobalOptimizedSolution> OptimizeAsync(GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var stopwatch = System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.StartNew();\n            \n            try\n            {\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"🚀 启动增强版线性规划优�?- 任务数：{TaskCount}，人员数：{PersonnelCount}，预筛选缓存：{CacheSize}\", \n                    context.Tasks.Count, context.AvailablePersonnel.Count, context.PrefilterResults.Count);\n\n                // 第一步：创建高性能求解�?\n                using var solver = CreateAdvancedSolver();\n\n                // 第二步：构建决策变量矩阵 (x[i,j] = 1表示任务i分配给人员j)\n                var decisionVariables = BuildDecisionVariables(solver, context);\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"📊 决策变量构建完成 - 变量数量：{VariableCount}\", decisionVariables.Count);\n\n                // 第三步：构建辅助变量 (支持复杂约束建模)\n                var auxiliaryVariables = BuildAuxiliaryVariables(solver, context, decisionVariables);\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"🔧 辅助变量构建完成 - 辅助变量数量：{AuxCount}\", auxiliaryVariables.Count);\n\n                // 第四步：Level 1 基础约束 - 对应遗传算法的基础约束验证\n                await AddLevel1BasicConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第五步：Level 2 组合约束 - 对应遗传算法的组合约束验�? \n                await AddLevel2CombinationConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第六步：Level 3 业务约束 - 对应遗传算法的业务逻辑约束\n                await AddLevel3BusinessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第七步：公平性约�?- 对应遗传算法的负载均衡机�?\n                AddFairnessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第八步：设置多维度目标函�?- 对应遗传算法的适应度函�?\n                SetEnhancedObjectiveFunction(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\n\n                // 第九步：执行求解\n                _logger.LogInformation(\"🔍 开始求解增强版线性规划模�?..\");\n            \n[... omitted 0 of 200 lines ...]\n\n            );\n\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"🔧 高性能求解器创建完成，配置：时间限制{TimeLimit}s，多线程支持\", MAX_SOLVER_TIME_SECONDS);\n            return solver;\n        }\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 【Ultra think增强】构建决策变�?- 集成人员班次不可用性的智能变量生成\n        /// 【核心优化】：在变量创建阶段就排除不可用组合，大幅提升求解效率\n        /// 【三层优化】：预筛选结�?+ 不可用性检�?+ 评分阈值，实现精确的变量裁�?\n        /// 【性能提升】：预计减少20-40%的决策变量数量，显著提升求解速度\n        /// </summary>\n        private Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> BuildDecisionVariables(\n            Solver solver, GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var variables = new Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable>();\n            var createdCount = 0;\n            var skippedCount = 0;\n            var unavailabilitySkippedCount = 0;\n            \n            foreach (var task in context.Tasks)\n            {\n                foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\n                {\n                    var prefilterKey = $\"{task.Id}_{personnel.Id}\";\n                    \n                    // 【Ultra think优化1】首先检查人员班次不可用�?- 硬排�?\n                    if (IsPersonnelUnavailableForTask(task, personnel.Id, context))\n                    {\n                        unavailabilitySkippedCount++;\n                        skippedCount++;\n                        _logger.LogDebug(\"🚫 跳过不可用组�?- 任务{TaskId}人员{PersonnelId}在{Date}班次{ShiftId}不可�?, \n                            task.Id, personnel.Id, task.WorkOrderDate.ToString(\"yyyy-MM-dd\"), task.ShiftId);\n                        continue;\n                    }\n                    \n                    // 【Ultra think优化2】基于预筛选结果的智能决策\n                    if (context.PrefilterResults.TryGetValue(prefilterKey, out var prefilterResult))\n                    {\n                        // 对于评分较高的分配，即使标记为不可行也创建变量（可能是保守评估）\n                        if (prefilterResult.IsFeasible || prefilterResult.PrefilterScore > 30.0)\n                        {\n                            var variableName = $\"x_{task.Id}_{personnel.Id}\";\n                            var variable = solver.MakeBoolVar(variableName);\n                            variables[(task.Id, personnel.Id)] = variable;\n                            createdCount++;\n                        }\n                        else\n                        {\n                            skippedCount++;\n                        }\n                    }\n                    else\n                    {\n                        // 【Ultra think优化3】无预筛选数据时的保守策�?\n                        // 即使无预筛选数据，但已通过不可用性检查，仍创建变�?\n                        var variableName = $\"x_{task.Id}_{personnel.Id}\";\n                        var variable = solver.MakeBoolVar(variableName);\n                        variables[(task.Id, personnel.Id)] = variable;\n                        createdCount++;\n                    }\n                }\n            }\n\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"📊 【增强版】决策变量构建统�?- 创建：{Created}个，跳过：{Skipped}个（不可用性：{UnavailabilitySkipped}），变量密度：{Density:P2}，不可用性优化率：{UnavailabilityRate:P2}\", \n                createdCount, skippedCount, unavailabilitySkippedCount, \n                (double)createdCount / (createdCount + skippedCount),\n                (double)unavailabilitySkippedCount / (createdCount + skippedCount));\n\n            return variables;\n        }\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Searching for code regions and headings**


Output: {"output":"        #region 求解器和变量构建\r\n        #region Level 1 基础约束 - 对应遗传算法基础约束验证\r\n        #region Level 2 组合约束 - 对应遗传算法组合约束验证\r\n        #region Level 3 业务约束 - 对应遗传算法业务逻辑验证\r\n        #region 公平性约束 - 对应遗传算法负载均衡机制\r\n        #region 目标函数 - 对应遗传算法适应度函数\r\n        #region 结果处理和验证\r\n        #region ShiftRuleValidationEngine集成辅助方法\r\n        #region 辅助方法\r\n        #region 增强版批次感知验证支持方法\r\n        #region 人员不可用性检查辅助方法\r\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.2}}


**Analyzing large file structure**


Select-String -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs -Pattern "BuildAuxiliaryVariables" -Context 0,40


Output: {"output":"\n> NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:68:                var auxiliaryVariables = BuildAuxiliaryVariables(solver, context, d\necisionVariables);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:69:                _logger.LogDebug(\"?? ��������������� - ��������������{AuxCount}\", \nauxiliaryVariables.Count);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:70:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:71:                // ���Ĳ���Level 1 ����Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨�Ļ���Լ����֤\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:72:                await AddLevel1BasicConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliar\nyVariables, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:73:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:74:                // ���岽��Level 2 ���Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨�����Լ����֤  \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:75:                await AddLevel2CombinationConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, au\nxiliaryVariables, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:76:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:77:                // ��������Level 3 ҵ��Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨��ҵ���߼�Լ��\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:78:                await AddLevel3BusinessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxil\niaryVariables, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:79:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:80:                // ���߲�����ƽ��Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨�ĸ��ؾ������\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:81:                AddFairnessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariable\ns, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:82:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:83:                // �ڰ˲������ö�ά��Ŀ�꺯�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨����Ӧ�Ⱥ���\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:84:                SetEnhancedObjectiveFunction(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVa\nriables, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:85:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:86:                // �ھŲ���ִ�����\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:87:                _logger.LogInformation(\"?? ��ʼ�����ǿ�����Թ滮ģ��...\");\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:88:                var resultStatus = solver.Solve();\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:89:                \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:90:                stopwatch.Stop();\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:91:                \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:92:                // ��ʮ������������֤���\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:93:                var solution = await ProcessEnhancedSolverResult(solver, decisionVa\nriables, auxiliaryVariables, \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:94:                    context, resultStatus, stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:95:                \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:96:                return solution;\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:97:            }\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:98:            catch (Exception ex)\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:99:            {\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:100:                stopwatch.Stop();\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:101:                _logger.LogError(ex, \"?? ��ǿ�����Թ滮�Ż��쳣����ʱ��{ElapsedMs}\nms\", stopwatch\n[... omitted 0 of 103 lines ...]\n\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Investigating method definitions and async usage**


Select-String -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs -Pattern "AddLevel1BasicConstraints" -Context 0,120


Output: {"output":"\n> NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:72:                await AddLevel1BasicConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliar\nyVariables, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:73:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:74:                // ���岽��Level 2 ���Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨�����Լ����֤  \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:75:                await AddLevel2CombinationConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, au\nxiliaryVariables, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:76:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:77:                // ��������Level 3 ҵ��Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨��ҵ���߼�Լ��\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:78:                await AddLevel3BusinessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxil\niaryVariables, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:79:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:80:                // ���߲�����ƽ��Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨�ĸ��ؾ������\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:81:                AddFairnessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariable\ns, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:82:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:83:                // �ڰ˲������ö�ά��Ŀ�꺯�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨����Ӧ�Ⱥ���\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:84:                SetEnhancedObjectiveFunction(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVa\nriables, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:85:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:86:                // �ھŲ���ִ�����\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:87:                _logger.LogInformation(\"?? ��ʼ�����ǿ�����Թ滮ģ��...\");\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:88:                var resultStatus = solver.Solve();\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:89:                \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:90:                stopwatch.Stop();\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:91:                \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:92:                // ��ʮ������������֤���\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:93:                var solution = await ProcessEnhancedSolverResult(solver, decisionVa\nriables, auxiliaryVariables, \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:94:                    context, resultStatus, stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:95:                \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:96:                return solution;\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:97:            }\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:98:            catch (Exception ex)\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:99:            {\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:100:                stopwatch.Stop();\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:101:                _logger.LogError(ex, \"?? ��ǿ�����Թ滮�Ż��쳣����ʱ��{ElapsedMs}\nms\", stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:102:                \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:103:                return CreateFailureSolution(ex.Message, stopwatch.ElapsedMillisec\nonds);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:104:            }\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:105:        }\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:106:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:107:        #region ������ͱ�������\n  NPP.\n[... omitted 26 of 282 lines ...]\n\nvices\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:362:                    {\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:363:                        constraint.SetCoefficient(kvp.Value, 1);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:364:                    }\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:365:                    constraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[$\"workload_{personnel.\nId}\"], -1);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:366:                    constraintCount++;\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:367:                }\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:368:            }\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:369:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:370:            _logger.LogDebug(\"? Level 1����Լ��������� - Լ��������{ConstraintCou\nnt}\", constraintCount);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:371:        }\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:372:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:373:        #endregion\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:374:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:375:        #region Level 2 ���Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨���Լ����֤\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:376:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:377:        /// <summary>\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:378:        /// ����Level 2���Լ�� - ��Ӧ�Ŵ��㷨��ExecuteLevel2CombinationConstraint\nValidation\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:379:        /// Լ�����ݣ���̬��ι��򡢿�������Դ����Լ��\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:380:        /// Լ���ص㣺����������ϵĶ�̬��֤��Υ��ʱ�ضȳͷ�\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:381:        /// </summary>\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:382:        private async Task AddLevel2CombinationConstraints(\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:383:            Solver solver,\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:384:            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:385:            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:386:            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:387:        {\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:388:            var constraintCount = 0;\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:389:            \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:390:            _logger.LogDebug(\"?? ��ʼ����Level 2���Լ��...\");\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:391:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:392:            // ���Լ��1����̬��ι���Լ�� - ��ӦCalculateDynamicShiftRuleScore\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:393:            //constraintCount += await AddDynamicShiftRuleConstraints(solver, deci\nsionVars, auxiliaryVars, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:394:            \n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:395:            // ���Լ��3����Ա�չ���������Լ��\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:396:            //constraintCount += AddDailyWorkloadConstraints(solver, decisionVars,\n auxiliaryVars, context);\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:397:\n  NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\\Services\\Integration\\Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs:398:            _logger.LogDebug(\"? Level 2���Լ��������� - Լ��������{ConstraintCou\nnt}\", constraintCount);\n\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.4}}


**Exploring method names and comments**


rg "^(\s*)(public|private|protected)" -n NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs


Output: {"output":"21:    public class LinearProgrammingEngine\r\n23:        private readonly ILogger<LinearProgrammingEngine> _logger;\r\n24:        private readonly ShiftRuleValidationEngine _shiftRuleEngine;\r\n27:        private const string SOLVER_TYPE = \"CBC_MIXED_INTEGER_PROGRAMMING\";\r\n28:        private const double OPTIMALITY_TOLERANCE = 1e-6;\r\n29:        private const int MAX_SOLVER_TIME_SECONDS = 600; // 增加到10分钟支持复杂约束\r\n30:        private const int MAX_CONSTRAINT_COUNT = 50000;   // 最大约束数量限制\r\n33:        private const double LEVEL1_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 1000000.0; // Level 1: 基础约束严厉惩罚\r\n34:        private const double LEVEL2_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 100000.0;  // Level 2: 组合约束重度惩罚  \r\n35:        private const double LEVEL3_CONSTRAINT_PENALTY = 10000.0;   // Level 3: 业务约束中度惩罚\r\n36:        private const double FAIRNESS_REWARD_FACTOR = 1000.0;       // 公平性奖励系数\r\n38:        public LinearProgrammingEngine(\r\n51:        public async Task<GlobalOptimizedSolution> OptimizeAsync(GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n112:        private Solver CreateAdvancedSolver()\r\n141:        private Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> BuildDecisionVariables(\r\n205:        private Dictionary<string, Variable> BuildAuxiliaryVariables(\r\n278:        private async Task AddLevel1BasicConstraints(\r\n382:        private async Task AddLevel2CombinationConstraints(\r\n407:        private async Task<int> AddDynamicShiftRuleConstraints(\r\n531:        private int AddDailyWorkloadConstraints(\r\n576:        private async Task AddLevel3BusinessConstraints(\r\n609:        private int AddFLPriorityConstraints(\r\n671:        private int AddSkillMatchingConstraints(\r\n709:        private int AddProjectContinuityConstraints(\r\n774:        private async Task<int> AddQualificationConstraints(\r\n835:        private void AddFairnessConstraints(\r\n932:        private void SetEnhancedObjectiveFunction(\r\n961:        private void AddBaseAssignmentScore(\r\n995:        private void AddConstraintViolationPenalties(\r\n1022:        private void AddFairnessRewards(\r\n1038:        private void AddBusinessPriorityRewards(\r\n1087:        private async Task<GlobalOptimizedSolution> ProcessEnhancedSolverResult(\r\n1156:        private async Task<SolutionQualityMetrics> ValidateSolutionQuality(\r\n1219:        private void LogWorkloadAnalysis(Dictionary<long, decimal> workloadDistribution, int totalTasks, int totalPersonnel)\r\n1249:        private List<WorkOrderEntity> BuildValidationContext(\r\n1317:        private Task<bool> IsSecondOrThirdShift(WorkOrderEntity task)\r\n1369:        private int EstimatePersonnelLevel(long personnelId)\r\n1412:        private double CalculateQualificationScore(long personnelId)\r\n1456:        private double CalculateExperienceScore(long personnelId)\r\n1497:        private double CalculateSeniorityScore(long personnelId)\r\n1543:        private async Task<bool> CheckQualificationCompatibilityAsync(long taskId, long personnelId, GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n1623:        private bool IsSkillMatched(decimal taskComplexity, int personnelLevel)\r\n1636:        private string ExtractProjectFromWorkOrderCode(string workOrderCode)\r\n1649:        private double CalculateSkillMatchingBonus(WorkOrderEntity task, long personnelId, GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n1672:        private double CalculateAssignmentScore(long taskId, long personnelId, GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n1694:        private double CalculateGiniCoefficient(List<decimal> values)\r\n1714:        private GlobalOptimizedSolution CreateFailureSolution(string errorMessage, long elapsedMs)\r\n1734:        private async Task<Dictionary<long, List<string>>> ExecuteBatchAwareValidationAsync(\r\n1831:        private List<WorkOrderEntity> BuildBatchSimulationContext(\r\n1867:        private List<string> CheckBatchTimeConflicts(\r\n1897:        private List<string> CheckBatchWorkloadLimits(\r\n1933:        private List<string> CheckPersonnelUnavailability(\r\n1960:        private bool HasTimeConflictInCombination(\r\n1988:        private bool IsTimeSlotOverlap(WorkOrderEntity task1, WorkOrderEntity task2)\r\n2018:        private PersonnelTaskMatrix BuildPersonnelTaskMatrix(\r\n2051:        private int CreateGlobalTimeSlotConstraints(\r\n2104:        private int CreateBatchIntegrityConstraints(\r\n2192:        private async Task<int> AddPersonnelUnavailabilityConstraints(\r\n2259:        private bool IsPersonnelUnavailableForTask(WorkOrderEntity task, long personnelId, GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n2311:        private async Task<bool> IsPersonnelUnavailableForTaskAsync(WorkOrderEntity task, long personnelId, GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n2324:    public class PersonnelTaskMatrix\r\n2326:        public Dictionary<long, List<WorkOrderEntity>> PersonnelTaskMap { get; set; } = new();\r\n2327:        public Dictionary<long, List<GlobalPersonnelInfo>> TaskPersonnelMap { get; set; } = new();\r\n2333:    public class TimeWindow : IEquatable<TimeWindow>\r\n2335:        public DateTime Date { get; set; }\r\n2336:        public long ShiftId { get; set; }\r\n2337:        public TimeSpan StartTime { get; set; }\r\n2339:        public bool Equals(TimeWindow other)\r\n2347:        public override bool Equals(object obj) => Equals(obj as TimeWindow);\r\n2349:        public override int GetHashCode() => HashCode.Combine(Date.Date, ShiftId, StartTime);\r\n2355:    public enum ConflictSeverity\r\n2367:    public static class WorkOrderEntityExtensions\r\n2374:        public static WorkOrderEntity CloneForValidation(this WorkOrderEntity original)\r\n2403:    public class SolutionQualityMetrics\r\n2405:        public double TaskCompletenessRate { get; set; }\r\n2406:        public double TimeConflictRate { get; set; }\r\n2407:        public double LoadBalanceScore { get; set; }\r\n2408:        public double PersonnelUtilizationRate { get; set; }\r\n2409:        public double ConstraintSatisfactionRate { get; set; }\r\n2410:        public List<string> ViolationDetails { get; set; } = new();\r\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.2}}


**Mapping key methods in file**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Index 200..320


Output: {"output":"Select-Object : �޷��󶨲�����Index�����޷���ֵ��200..320��ת��Ϊ���͡�System.Int32��������:�������ַ����ĸ�ʽ����ȷ����\r\n����λ�� ��:1 �ַ�: 122\r\n+ ... Algorithms\\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Index 200..320\r\n+                                                                  ~~~~~~~~\r\n    + CategoryInfo          : InvalidArgument: (:) [Select-Object]��ParameterBindingException\r\n    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CannotConvertArgumentNoMessage,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.SelectObjectCommand\r\n \r\n","metadata":{"exit_code":1,"duration_seconds":0.4}}


Summary: auto


**Adjusting PowerShell object selection approach**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Skip 200 -First 140


Output: {"output":"        /// <summary>\r\n        /// 构建辅助变量 - 支持复杂约束的线性化建模\r\n        /// 包含：负载均衡变量、时间冲突指示变量、班次规则违规变量等\r\n        /// </summary>\r\n        private Dictionary<string, Variable> BuildAuxiliaryVariables(\r\n            Solver solver, GlobalAllocationContext context, \r\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVariables)\r\n        {\r\n            var auxiliaryVars = new Dictionary<string, Variable>();\r\n\r\n            // 1. 人员工作负载变量 (连续变量，表示每个人员的任务数量)\r\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n            {\r\n                var workloadVar = solver.MakeIntVar(0, context.Tasks.Count, $\"workload_{personnel.Id}\");\r\n                auxiliaryVars[$\"workload_{personnel.Id}\"] = workloadVar;\r\n            }\r\n\r\n            // 2. 负载均衡偏差变量 (支持公平性目标建�?\r\n            var avgWorkload = (double)context.Tasks.Count / context.AvailablePersonnel.Count;\r\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n            {\r\n                // 正偏差变�?(超出平均负载的部�?\r\n                var posDeviationVar = solver.MakeNumVar(0, context.Tasks.Count, $\"pos_dev_{personnel.Id}\");\r\n                auxiliaryVars[$\"pos_dev_{personnel.Id}\"] = posDeviationVar;\r\n                \r\n                // 负偏差变�?(低于平均负载的部�?\r\n                var negDeviationVar = solver.MakeNumVar(0, avgWorkload, $\"neg_dev_{personnel.Id}\");\r\n                auxiliaryVars[$\"neg_dev_{personnel.Id}\"] = negDeviationVar;\r\n            }\r\n\r\n            // 3. 时间冲突指示变量 (二进制变量，标识是否存在时间冲突)\r\n            var timeSlots = context.Tasks.Select(t => new { Date = t.WorkOrderDate.Date })\r\n                                         .Distinct().ToList();\r\n            \r\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n            {\r\n                foreach (var timeSlot in timeSlots)\r\n                {\r\n                    var conflictVar = solver.MakeBoolVar($\"conflict_{personnel.Id}_{timeSlot.Date:yyyyMMdd}\");\r\n                    auxiliaryVars[$\"conflict_{personnel.Id}_{timeSlot.Date:yyyyMMdd}\"] = conflictVar;\r\n                }\r\n            }\r\n\r\n            /*// 4. 班次规则违规变量 (支持复杂班次规则的线性化)\r\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n            {\r\n                // 二班/三班后休息规则违规变�?\r\n                var shiftRuleViolationVar = solver.MakeIntVar(0, context.Tasks.Count, $\"shift_violation_{personnel.Id}\");\r\n                auxiliaryVars[$\"shift_violation_{personnel.Id}\"] = shiftRuleViolationVar;\r\n            }\r\n\r\n            // 5. FL优先级违规变�?(Level 3业务约束支持)\r\n            foreach (var task in context.Tasks)\r\n            {\r\n                var flViolationVar = solver.MakeBoolVar($\"fl_violation_{task.Id}\");\r\n                auxiliaryVars[$\"fl_violation_{task.Id}\"] = flViolationVar;\r\n            }*/\r\n\r\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"🔧 辅助变量构建完成 - 总数：{AuxVarCount}（工作负载：{WorkloadCount}，冲突指示：{ConflictCount}，班次违规：{ShiftCount}，FL违规：{FLCount}�?, \r\n                auxiliaryVars.Count,\r\n                context.Tasks.Count / context.AvailablePersonnel.Count,\r\n                context.AvailablePersonnel.Count * timeSlots.Count,\r\n                context.AvailablePersonnel.Count,\r\n                context.Tasks.Count);\r\n\r\n            return auxiliaryVars;\r\n        }\r\n\r\n        #endregion\r\n\r\n        #region Level 1 基础约束 - 对应遗传算法基础约束验证\r\n\r\n        /// <summary>\r\n        /// 添加Level 1基础约束 - 对应遗传算法的ExecuteLevel1BasicConstraintValidation\r\n        /// 约束内容：任务分配完整性、基本时间冲突检�?\r\n        /// 约束特点：必�?00%满足，违反即淘汰\r\n        /// </summary>\r\n        private async Task AddLevel1BasicConstraints(\r\n            Solver solver,\r\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\r\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\r\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n        {\r\n            await Task.CompletedTask;\r\n            var constraintCount = 0;\r\n            \r\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"🏗�?开始添加Level 1基础约束...\");\r\n\r\n            // 基础约束1：任务分配完整�?- 每个任务必须且只能分配给一个人�?\r\n            foreach (var task in context.Tasks)\r\n            {\r\n                var taskVariables = decisionVars.Where(v => v.Key.TaskId == task.Id).Select(v => v.Value).ToList();\r\n                if (taskVariables.Any())\r\n                {\r\n                    var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(1, 1, $\"task_assignment_{task.Id}\");\r\n                    foreach (var variable in taskVariables)\r\n                    {\r\n                        constraint.SetCoefficient(variable, 1);\r\n                    }\r\n                    constraintCount++;\r\n                }\r\n            }\r\n\r\n            // 基础约束2：基本时间冲突约�?- 同一人员不能在同一时间段执行多个任�?\r\n            // 这里使用线性约束替代遗传算法中的CalculateBasicTimeConflictScore逻辑\r\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n            {\r\n                // 按时间段分组检查冲�?\r\n                var timeGroups = context.Tasks.GroupBy(t => new { Date = t.WorkOrderDate.Date });\r\n                \r\n                foreach (var timeGroup in timeGroups)\r\n                {\r\n                    var timeSlotTasks = timeGroup.ToList();\r\n                    if (timeSlotTasks.Count > 1) // 同一时间段有多个任务才需要约�?\r\n                    {\r\n                        var timeSlotVariables = timeSlotTasks\r\n                            .Where(task => decisionVars.ContainsKey((task.Id, personnel.Id)))\r\n                            .Select(task => decisionVars[(task.Id, personnel.Id)])\r\n                            .ToList();\r\n\r\n                        if (timeSlotVariables.Count > 1)\r\n                        {\r\n                            // 约束：同一人员在同一时间段最多执�?个任�?\r\n                            var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, 1, \r\n                                $\"time_conflict_{personnel.Id}_{timeGroup.Key.Date:yyyyMMdd}\");\r\n                            \r\n                            foreach (var variable in timeSlotVariables)\r\n                            {\r\n                                constraint.SetCoefficient(variable, 1);\r\n                            }\r\n                            constraintCount++;\r\n\r\n                            // 连接辅助变量（用于目标函数惩罚）\r\n                            var conflictVarKey = $\"conflict_{personnel.Id}_{timeGroup.Key.Date:yyyyMMdd}\";\r\n                            if (auxiliaryVars.ContainsKey(conflictVarKey))\r\n                            {\r\n                                // 如果分配了多个任务，冲突变量=1\r\n                                var conflictConstraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, double.PositiveInfinity, \r\n                                    $\"conflict_indicator_{personnel.Id}_{timeGroup.Key.Date:yyyyMMdd}\");\r\n                                \r\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Extending snippet review**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Skip 280 -First 200


Output: {"output":"            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            await Task.CompletedTask;\n            var constraintCount = 0;\n            \n            _logger.LogDebug(\"🏗�?开始添加Level 1基础约束...\");\n\n            // 基础约束1：任务分配完整�?- 每个任务必须且只能分配给一个人�?\n            foreach (var task in context.Tasks)\n            {\n                var taskVariables = decisionVars.Where(v => v.Key.TaskId == task.Id).Select(v => v.Value).ToList();\n                if (taskVariables.Any())\n                {\n                    var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(1, 1, $\"task_assignment_{task.Id}\");\n                    foreach (var variable in taskVariables)\n                    {\n                        constraint.SetCoefficient(variable, 1);\n                    }\n                    constraintCount++;\n                }\n            }\n\n            // 基础约束2：基本时间冲突约�?- 同一人员不能在同一时间段执行多个任�?\n            // 这里使用线性约束替代遗传算法中的CalculateBasicTimeConflictScore逻辑\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\n            {\n                // 按时间段分组检查冲�?\n                var timeGroups = context.Tasks.GroupBy(t => new { Date = t.WorkOrderDate.Date });\n                \n                foreach (var timeGroup in timeGroups)\n                {\n                    var timeSlotTasks = timeGroup.ToList();\n                    if (timeSlotTasks.Count > 1) // 同一时间段有多个任务才需要约�?\n                    {\n                        var timeSlotVariables = timeSlotTasks\n                            .Where(task => decisionVars.ContainsKey((task.Id, personnel.Id)))\n                            .Select(task => decisionVars[(task.Id, personnel.Id)])\n                            .ToList();\n\n                        if (timeSlotVariables.Count > 1)\n                        {\n                            // 约束：同一人员在同一时间段最多执�?个任�?\n                            var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, 1, \n                                $\"time_conflict_{personnel.Id}_{timeGroup.Key.Date:yyyyMMdd}\");\n                            \n                            foreach (var variable in timeSlotVariables)\n                            {\n                                constraint.SetCoefficient(variable, 1);\n                            }\n                            constraintCount++;\n\n                            // 连接辅助变量（用于目标函数惩罚）\n                            var conflictVarKey = $\"conflict_{personnel.Id}_{timeGroup.Key.Date:yyyyMMdd}\";\n                            if (auxiliaryVars.ContainsKey(conflictVarKey))\n                            {\n                                // 如果分配了多个任务，冲突变量=1\n                                var conflictConstraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, double.PositiveInfinity, \n                                    $\"conflict_indicator_{personnel.Id}_{timeGroup.Key.Date:yyyyMMdd}\");\n                                \n                                foreach (var variable in timeSlotVariables)\n                                {\n                                    conflictConstraint.SetCoefficient(variable, 1);\n                                }\n                                conflictConstraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[conflictVarKey], -timeSlotVariables.Count + 1);\n                                constraintCount++;\n                            }\n                        }\n                    }\n                }\n            }\n\n            // 基础约束3：工作负载计算约�?- 连接决策变量与辅助变�?\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\n            {\n                var personnelTasks = decisionVars.Where(v => v.Key.PersonnelId == personnel.Id).ToList();\n                if (personnelTasks.Any() && auxiliaryVars.ContainsKey($\"workload_{personnel.Id}\"))\n                {\n                    var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, 0, $\"workload_calc_{personnel.Id}\");\n                    \n                    foreach (var kvp in personnelTasks)\n                    {\n                        constraint.SetCoefficient(kvp.Value, 1);\n                    }\n                    constraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[$\"workload_{personnel.Id}\"], -1);\n                    constraintCount++;\n                }\n            }\n\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"�?Level 1基础约束添加完成 - 约束数量：{ConstraintCount}\", constraintCount);\n        }\n\n        #endregion\n\n        #region Level 2 组合约束 - 对应遗传算法组合约束验证\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 添加Level 2组合约束 - 对应遗传算法的ExecuteLevel2CombinationConstraintValidation\n        /// 约束内容：动态班次规则、跨任务资源竞争约束\n        /// 约束特点：基于任务组合的动态验证，违反时重度惩�?\n        /// </summary>\n        private asyn\n[... omitted 0 of 200 lines ...]\n\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var constraintCount = 0;\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"🚀 启动增强版批次感知班次规则约束构�?..\");\n\n            // 【架构创�?】构建人员任务关联矩阵，支持高效的批次验�?\n            var personnelTaskMatrix = BuildPersonnelTaskMatrix(decisionVars, context);\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"📊 人员任务矩阵构建完成 - 人员映射：{PersonnelCount}，任务映射：{TaskCount}\", \n                personnelTaskMatrix.PersonnelTaskMap.Count, personnelTaskMatrix.TaskPersonnelMap.Count);\n\n            // 【架构创�?】为每个人员构建批次感知的验证上下文\n            var batchValidationResults = new Dictionary<long, Dictionary<long, List<string>>>();\n            \n            foreach (var personnelEntry in personnelTaskMatrix.PersonnelTaskMap)\n            {\n                var personnelId = personnelEntry.Key;\n                var possibleTasks = personnelEntry.Value;\n                \n                if (possibleTasks.Count > 1) // 只对有多个可能任务的人员进行批次验证\n                {\n                    batchValidationResults[personnelId] = await ExecuteBatchAwareValidationAsync(\n                        personnelId, possibleTasks, context, personnelTaskMatrix);\n                }\n            }\n\n            // 【架构创�?】基于批次验证结果创建约�?\n            var shiftViolationVars = new Dictionary<string, Variable>();\n            \n            foreach (var kvp in decisionVars)\n            {\n                var (taskId, personnelId) = kvp.Key;\n                var assignmentVar = kvp.Value;\n                \n                // 创建该分配的班次规则违规指示变量\n                var violationVarKey = $\"batch_aware_shift_violation_{taskId}_{personnelId}\";\n                var violationVar = solver.MakeBoolVar(violationVarKey);\n                shiftViolationVars[violationVarKey] = violationVar;\n                \n                // 【批次感知验证】检查该分配在批次上下文中的合规�?\n                var hasViolation = false;\n                \n                if (batchValidationResults.TryGetValue(personnelId, out var personnelValidationResults))\n                {\n                    if (personnelValidationResults.TryGetValue(taskId, out var violations))\n                    {\n                        hasViolation = violations.Any();\n                        \n                        if (hasViolation)\n                        {\n                            _logger.LogDebug(\"📋 批次感知验证发现冲突 - 任务{TaskId}人员{PersonnelId}：{Violations}\", \n                                taskId, personnelId, string.Join(\"; \", violations.Take(2)));\n                        }\n                    }\n                }\n                else\n                {\n                    // 【后备验证】单任务人员使用传统验证\n                    var task = context.Tasks.FirstOrDefault(t => t.Id == taskId);\n                    if (task != null)\n                    {\n                        var otherAssignments = BuildValidationContext(personnelId, taskId, context, decisionVars);\n                        var conflicts = await _shiftRuleEngine.ValidateShiftRulesWithEnhancedBatchContextAsync(\n                            personnelId, task, otherAssignments, context);\n                        hasViolation = conflicts.Any();\n                    }\n                }\n\n                // 【约束建模】基于验证结果创建约�?\n                if (hasViolation)\n                {","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Updating plan after mapping layout**


Skim class layout to map major responsibilities


Output: Plan updated


**Analyzing key methods for issues**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Skip 40 -First 130


Output: {"output":"        {\r\n            _logger = logger ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(logger));\r\n            _shiftRuleEngine = shiftRuleEngine ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(shiftRuleEngine));\r\n        }\r\n\r\n        /// <summary>\r\n        /// 执行增强版线性规划优�?- 实现遗传算法等价的约束体�?\r\n        /// 业务流程：构建决策变�?�?三级约束建模 �?多目标优�?�?精确求解 �?解析结果\r\n        /// 核心创新：将启发式约束转换为线性约束，实现数学最优解\r\n        /// </summary>\r\n        public async Task<GlobalOptimizedSolution> OptimizeAsync(GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n        {\r\n            var stopwatch = System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch.StartNew();\r\n            \r\n            try\r\n            {\r\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"🚀 启动增强版线性规划优�?- 任务数：{TaskCount}，人员数：{PersonnelCount}，预筛选缓存：{CacheSize}\", \r\n                    context.Tasks.Count, context.AvailablePersonnel.Count, context.PrefilterResults.Count);\r\n\r\n                // 第一步：创建高性能求解�?\r\n                using var solver = CreateAdvancedSolver();\r\n\r\n                // 第二步：构建决策变量矩阵 (x[i,j] = 1表示任务i分配给人员j)\r\n                var decisionVariables = BuildDecisionVariables(solver, context);\r\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"📊 决策变量构建完成 - 变量数量：{VariableCount}\", decisionVariables.Count);\r\n\r\n                // 第三步：构建辅助变量 (支持复杂约束建模)\r\n                var auxiliaryVariables = BuildAuxiliaryVariables(solver, context, decisionVariables);\r\n                _logger.LogDebug(\"🔧 辅助变量构建完成 - 辅助变量数量：{AuxCount}\", auxiliaryVariables.Count);\r\n\r\n                // 第四步：Level 1 基础约束 - 对应遗传算法的基础约束验证\r\n                await AddLevel1BasicConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\r\n\r\n                // 第五步：Level 2 组合约束 - 对应遗传算法的组合约束验�? \r\n                await AddLevel2CombinationConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\r\n\r\n                // 第六步：Level 3 业务约束 - 对应遗传算法的业务逻辑约束\r\n                await AddLevel3BusinessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\r\n\r\n                // 第七步：公平性约�?- 对应遗传算法的负载均衡机�?\r\n                AddFairnessConstraints(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\r\n\r\n                // 第八步：设置多维度目标函�?- 对应遗传算法的适应度函�?\r\n                SetEnhancedObjectiveFunction(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, context);\r\n\r\n                // 第九步：执行求解\r\n                _logger.LogInformation(\"🔍 开始求解增强版线性规划模�?..\");\r\n                var resultStatus = solver.Solve();\r\n                \r\n                stopwatch.Stop();\r\n                \r\n                // 第十步：解析和验证结�?\r\n                var solution = await ProcessEnhancedSolverResult(solver, decisionVariables, auxiliaryVariables, \r\n                    context, resultStatus, stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds);\r\n                \r\n                return solution;\r\n            }\r\n            catch (Exception ex)\r\n            {\r\n                stopwatch.Stop();\r\n                _logger.LogError(ex, \"💥 增强版线性规划优化异常，耗时：{ElapsedMs}ms\", stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds);\r\n                \r\n                return CreateFailureSolution(ex.Message, stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds);\r\n            }\r\n        }\r\n\r\n        #region 求解器和变量构建\r\n\r\n        /// <summary>\r\n        /// 创建高性能求解�?- 支持大规模约束优�?\r\n        /// </summary>\r\n        private Solver CreateAdvancedSolver()\r\n        {\r\n            var solver = Solver.CreateSolver(SOLVER_TYPE);\r\n            if (solver == null)\r\n            {\r\n                throw new InvalidOperationException(\"无法创建增强版线性规划求解器\");\r\n            }\r\n\r\n            // 高性能配置\r\n            solver.SetTimeLimit(MAX_SOLVER_TIME_SECONDS * 1000);\r\n            \r\n            // 设置优化参数\r\n            solver.SetSolverSpecificParametersAsString(\r\n                \"cuts=1 \" +           // 启用割平�?\r\n                \"heuristics=1 \" +     // 启用启发式算�?\r\n                \"presolve=1 \" +       // 启用预处�?\r\n                \"threads=0\"           // 使用所有可用线�?\r\n            );\r\n\r\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"🔧 高性能求解器创建完成，配置：时间限制{TimeLimit}s，多线程支持\", MAX_SOLVER_TIME_SECONDS);\r\n            return solver;\r\n        }\r\n\r\n        /// <summary>\r\n        /// 【Ultra think增强】构建决策变�?- 集成人员班次不可用性的智能变量生成\r\n        /// 【核心优化】：在变量创建阶段就排除不可用组合，大幅提升求解效率\r\n        /// 【三层优化】：预筛选结�?+ 不可用性检�?+ 评分阈值，实现精确的变量裁�?\r\n        /// 【性能提升】：预计减少20-40%的决策变量数量，显著提升求解速度\r\n        /// </summary>\r\n        private Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> BuildDecisionVariables(\r\n            Solver solver, GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n        {\r\n            var variables = new Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable>();\r\n            var createdCount = 0;\r\n            var skippedCount = 0;\r\n            var unavailabilitySkippedCount = 0;\r\n            \r\n            foreach (var task in context.Tasks)\r\n            {\r\n                foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n                {\r\n                    var prefilterKey = $\"{task.Id}_{personnel.Id}\";\r\n                    \r\n                    // 【Ultra think优化1】首先检查人员班次不可用�?- 硬排�?\r\n                    if (IsPersonnelUnavailableForTask(task, personnel.Id, context))\r\n                    {\r\n                        unavailabilitySkippedCount++;\r\n                        skippedCount++;\r\n                        _logger.LogDebug(\"🚫 跳过不可用组�?- 任务{TaskId}人员{PersonnelId}在{Date}班次{ShiftId}不可�?, \r\n                            task.Id, personnel.Id, task.WorkOrderDate.ToString(\"yyyy-MM-dd\"), task.ShiftId);\r\n                        continue;\r\n                    }\r\n                    \r\n                    // 【Ultra think优化2】基于预筛选结果的智能决策\r\n                    if (context.PrefilterResults.TryGetValue(prefilterKey, out var prefilterResult))\r\n                    {\r\n                        // 对于评分较高的分配，即使标记为不可行也创建变量（可能是保守评估）\r\n                        if (prefilterResult.IsFeasible || prefilterResult.PrefilterScore > 30.0)\r\n                        {\r\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Investigating AddLevel2 method details**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Skip 360 -First 220


Output: {"output":"                    foreach (var kvp in personnelTasks)\n                    {\n                        constraint.SetCoefficient(kvp.Value, 1);\n                    }\n                    constraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[$\"workload_{personnel.Id}\"], -1);\n                    constraintCount++;\n                }\n            }\n\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"�?Level 1基础约束添加完成 - 约束数量：{ConstraintCount}\", constraintCount);\n        }\n\n        #endregion\n\n        #region Level 2 组合约束 - 对应遗传算法组合约束验证\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 添加Level 2组合约束 - 对应遗传算法的ExecuteLevel2CombinationConstraintValidation\n        /// 约束内容：动态班次规则、跨任务资源竞争约束\n        /// 约束特点：基于任务组合的动态验证，违反时重度惩�?\n        /// </summary>\n        private async Task AddLevel2CombinationConstraints(\n            Solver solver,\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var constraintCount = 0;\n            \n            _logger.LogDebug(\"🔄 开始添加Level 2组合约束...\");\n\n            // 组合约束1：动态班次规则约�?- 对应CalculateDynamicShiftRuleScore\n            //constraintCount += await AddDynamicShiftRuleConstraints(solver, decisionVars, auxiliaryVars, context);\n            \n            // 组合约束3：人员日工作量限制约�?\n            //constraintCount += AddDailyWorkloadConstraints(solver, decisionVars, auxiliaryVars, context);\n\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"�?Level 2组合约束添加完成 - 约束数量：{ConstraintCount}\", constraintCount);\n        }\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 【架构重构】添加增强版批次感知班次规则约束 - 真正解决批次验证问题\n        /// 【核心创新】：集成批次感知验证，考虑当前分配组合与历史数据的整体验证\n        /// 【深度实现】：使用PersonnelTaskMatrix进行高效的关联查询和冲突检�?\n        /// 【Ultra think级别】：从根本上解决单任�?历史验证的架构缺�?\n        /// </summary>\n        private async Task<int> AddDynamicShiftRuleConstraints(\n            Solver solver,\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var constraintCount = 0;\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"🚀 启动增强版批次感知班次规则约束构�?..\");\n\n            // 【架构创�?】构建人员任务关联矩阵，支持高效的批次验�?\n            var personnelTaskMatrix = BuildPersonnelTaskMatrix(decisionVars, context);\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"📊 人员任务矩阵构建完成 - 人员映射：{PersonnelCount}，任务映射：{TaskCount}\", \n                personnelTaskMatrix.PersonnelTaskMap.Count, personnelTaskMatrix.TaskPersonnelMap.Count);\n\n            // 【架构创�?】为每个人员构建批次感知的验证上下文\n            var batchValidationResults = new Dictionary<long, Dictionary<long, List<string>>>();\n            \n            foreach (var personnelEntry in personnelTaskMatrix.PersonnelTaskMap)\n            {\n                var personnelId = personnelEntry.Key;\n                var possibleTasks = personnelEntry.Value;\n                \n                if (possibleTasks.Count > 1) // 只对有多个可能任务的人员进行批次验证\n                {\n                    batchValidationResults[personnelId] = await ExecuteBatchAwareValidationAsync(\n                        personnelId, possibleTasks, context, personnelTaskMatrix);\n                }\n            }\n\n            // 【架构创�?】基于批次验证结果创建约�?\n            var shiftViolationVars = new Dictionary<string, Variable>();\n            \n            foreach (var kvp in decisionVars)\n            {\n                var (taskId, personnelId) = kvp.Key;\n                var assignmentVar = kvp.Value;\n                \n                // 创建该分配的班次规则违规指示变量\n                var violationVarKey = $\"batch_aware_shift_violation_{taskId}_{personnelId}\";\n                var violationVar = solver.MakeBoolVar(violationVarKey);\n                shiftViolationVars[violationVarKey] = violationVar;\n                \n                // 【批次感知验证】检查该分配在批次上下文中的合规�?\n                var hasViolation = false;\n                \n                if (batchValidationResults.TryGetValue(personnelId, out var personnelValidationResults))\n                {\n                    if (personnelValidationResults.TryGetValue(taskId, out var violations))\n                    {\n                        hasViolation = violations.Any();\n                        \n                        if (hasViolation)\n                        {\n                            _logger.LogDebug(\"📋 批次感知\n[... omitted 0 of 220 lines ...]\n\n                else\n                {\n                    // 无冲突时强制违规变量�?\n                    var noViolationConstraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, 0,\n                        $\"batch_no_violation_{taskId}_{personnelId}\");\n                    noViolationConstraint.SetCoefficient(violationVar, 1);\n                    constraintCount++;\n                }\n            }\n\n            // 【架构创�?】添加全局批次完整性约�?\n            constraintCount += CreateGlobalTimeSlotConstraints(solver, decisionVars, context);\n            constraintCount += CreateBatchIntegrityConstraints(solver, decisionVars, auxiliaryVars, context);\n            \n            // 【全局约束】总违规数量限�?\n            var totalViolations = shiftViolationVars.Values.ToList();\n            if (totalViolations.Any())\n            {\n                var maxAllowedViolations = Math.Max(1, context.Tasks.Count / 10);\n                var totalViolationConstraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, maxAllowedViolations, \"max_batch_shift_violations\");\n                \n                foreach (var violationVar in totalViolations)\n                {\n                    totalViolationConstraint.SetCoefficient(violationVar, 1);\n                }\n                constraintCount++;\n                \n                // 将违规变量添加到辅助变量集合�?\n                foreach (var kvp in shiftViolationVars)\n                {\n                    auxiliaryVars[kvp.Key] = kvp.Value;\n                }\n            }\n\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"�?增强版批次感知班次规则约束构建完�?- 约束数量：{ConstraintCount}，批次验证人员：{BatchPersonnelCount}，违规变量：{ViolationVarCount}\", \n                constraintCount, batchValidationResults.Count, shiftViolationVars.Count);\n            return constraintCount;\n        }\n        \n        /// <summary>\n        /// 添加日工作量约束 - 限制人员每日工作负载\n        /// </summary>\n        private int AddDailyWorkloadConstraints(\n            Solver solver,\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var constraintCount = 0;\n            const int maxDailyHours = 8; // 每日最大工作时长（包含加班�?\n\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\n            {\n                // 按日期分组该人员的任�?\n                var dailyGroups = context.Tasks\n                    .Where(t => decisionVars.ContainsKey((t.Id, personnel.Id)))\n                    .GroupBy(t => t.WorkOrderDate.Date);\n\n                foreach (var dailyGroup in dailyGroups)\n                {\n                    var dailyTasks = dailyGroup.ToList();\n                    \n                    var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, maxDailyHours, \n                        $\"daily_workload_{personnel.Id}_{dailyGroup.Key:yyyyMMdd}\");\n\n                    foreach (var task in dailyTasks)\n                    {\n                        var estimatedHours = task.EstimatedHours ?? 1.0m; // 默认1小时\n                        constraint.SetCoefficient(decisionVars[(task.Id, personnel.Id)], (double)estimatedHours);\n                    }\n                    constraintCount++;\n                }\n            }\n\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"�?日工作量约束构建完成 - 约束数量：{WorkloadConstraintCount}\", constraintCount);\n            return constraintCount;\n        }\n\n        #endregion\n\n        #region Level 3 业务约束 - 对应遗传算法业务逻辑验证\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 添加Level 3业务约束 - 对应遗传算法的ExecuteLevel3BusinessLogicValidation\n        /// 约束内容：FL优先级规则、人员技能匹配、项目连续性约�?\n        /// 约束特点：业务规则严格执行，允许一定弹性但必须符合核心业务逻辑\n        /// </summary>\n        private async Task AddLevel3BusinessConstraints(\n            Solver solver,\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Examining constraint addition methods**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Skip 570 -First 260


Output: {"output":"        /// <summary>\n        /// 添加Level 3业务约束 - 对应遗传算法的ExecuteLevel3BusinessLogicValidation\n        /// 约束内容：FL优先级规则、人员技能匹配、项目连续性约�?\n        /// 约束特点：业务规则严格执行，允许一定弹性但必须符合核心业务逻辑\n        /// </summary>\n        private async Task AddLevel3BusinessConstraints(\n            Solver solver,\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            await Task.CompletedTask;\n            var constraintCount = 0;\n            \n            _logger.LogDebug(\"💼 开始添加Level 3业务约束...\");\n\n            // 业务约束1：FL优先级规�?- 对应CalculateFLPriorityRuleScore\n            //constraintCount += AddFLPriorityConstraints(solver, decisionVars, auxiliaryVars, context);\n\n            // 业务约束2：人员技能匹配约�?- 对应CalculateSkillMatchingConstraintScore\n            //constraintCount += AddSkillMatchingConstraints(solver, decisionVars, auxiliaryVars, context);\n\n            // 业务约束3：项目连续性约�?- 对应CalculateProjectContinuityConstraintScore\n            //constraintCount += AddProjectContinuityConstraints(solver, decisionVars, auxiliaryVars, context);\n\n            // 业务约束4：人员资质约�?- 确保只分配给具备相应资质的人�?\n            //constraintCount += await AddQualificationConstraints(solver, decisionVars, context);\n            \n            // 业务约束5：【Ultra think】人员班次不可用性硬约束 - 确保不会分配给不可用人员\n            //constraintCount += await AddPersonnelUnavailabilityConstraints(solver, decisionVars, context);\n            \n            _logger.LogDebug(\"�?Level 3业务约束添加完成 - 约束数量：{ConstraintCount}\", constraintCount);\n        }\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 添加FL优先级约�?- 对应遗传算法的FL优先级规则验�?\n        /// 规则10：优先分配本项目FL人员\n        /// </summary>\n        private int AddFLPriorityConstraints(\n            Solver solver,\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var constraintCount = 0;\n\n            foreach (var task in context.Tasks)\n            {\n                // 获取该任务关联的FL人员\n                var taskFLPersonnel = task.WorkOrderFLPersonnels?\n                    .Select(fl => fl.FLPersonnelId)\n                    .Where(flId => context.AvailablePersonnel.Any(p => p.Id == flId))\n                    .ToList() ?? new List<long>();\n\n                if (taskFLPersonnel.Any())\n                {\n                    // 创建FL优先约束：优先分配给FL人员，如果分配给非FL人员则记录违�?\n                    var flViolationVarKey = $\"fl_violation_{task.Id}\";\n                    if (auxiliaryVars.ContainsKey(flViolationVarKey))\n                    {\n                        var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, double.PositiveInfinity, $\"fl_priority_{task.Id}\");\n                        \n                        // FL人员分配变量\n                        foreach (var flPersonnelId in taskFLPersonnel)\n                        {\n                            if (decisionVars.ContainsKey((task.Id, flPersonnelId)))\n                            {\n                                constraint.SetCoefficient(decisionVars[(task.Id, flPersonnelId)], 1);\n                            }\n                        }\n                        \n                        // 非FL人员分配变量\n                        var nonFLPersonnel = context.AvailablePersonnel\n                            .Where(p => !taskFLPersonnel.Contains(p.Id))\n                            .ToList();\n                            \n                        foreach (var nonFL in nonFLPersonnel)\n                        {\n                            if (decisionVars.ContainsKey((task.Id, nonFL.Id)))\n                            {\n                                constraint.SetCoefficient(decisionVars[(task.Id, nonFL.Id)], -1);\n                            }\n                        }\n                        \n                        // 违规指示变量\n                        constraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[flViolationVarKey], 1);\n                        constraintCount++;\n                    }\n                }\n            }\n\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"�?FL优先级约束构建完�?- 约束数量：{FLConstraintCount}\", constraintCount);\n            return constraintCount;\n        }\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 【重构简化】技能匹配约�?- 基于预筛选结果的轻量级实�?\n        /// 【架构优化】：移除复杂的多源资质逻辑，依赖预筛选阶段的专业验证\n        /// 【职责分离】：技能匹配交由ContextBuilderEngine处理，这里仅做约束\n[... omitted 4 of 260 lines ...]\n\n人员参与指示变�?\n                var projectPersonnelVars = new Dictionary<long, Variable>();\n                foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\n                {\n                    var participationVar = solver.MakeBoolVar($\"project_participation_{projectGroup.Key}_{personnel.Id}\");\n                    projectPersonnelVars[personnel.Id] = participationVar;\n                    \n                    // 如果人员参与项目，则至少分配一个任�?\n                    var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, double.PositiveInfinity, \n                        $\"project_min_tasks_{projectGroup.Key}_{personnel.Id}\");\n                    \n                    constraint.SetCoefficient(participationVar, -1);\n                    \n                    foreach (var task in projectTasks)\n                    {\n                        if (decisionVars.ContainsKey((task.Id, personnel.Id)))\n                        {\n                            constraint.SetCoefficient(decisionVars[(task.Id, personnel.Id)], 1);\n                        }\n                    }\n                    constraintCount++;\n                }\n                \n                // 限制项目参与人员总数\n                var personnelLimitConstraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, maxProjectPersonnel, \n                    $\"project_personnel_limit_{projectGroup.Key}\");\n                \n                foreach (var kvp in projectPersonnelVars)\n                {\n                    personnelLimitConstraint.SetCoefficient(kvp.Value, 1);\n                }\n                constraintCount++;\n            }\n\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"�?项目连续性约束构建完�?- 约束数量：{ContinuityConstraintCount}\", constraintCount);\n            return constraintCount;\n        }\n\n        /// <summary>\n        /// 【重构优化】添加人员资质约�?- 基于ContextBuilderEngine的成熟实�?\n        /// 【架构改进】：复用预构建的预筛选结果，避免重复的资质验证逻辑\n        /// 【性能优化】：利用PrefilterResults缓存，实现O(1)查询复杂�?\n        /// 【一致性保证】：与ContextBuilderEngine使用完全相同的资质验证标�?\n        /// </summary>\n        private async Task<int> AddQualificationConstraints(\n            Solver solver,\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\n        {\n            var constraintCount = 0;\n            \n            _logger.LogDebug(\"🔍 开始构建资质约�?- 基于预筛选结果的高效实现\");\n\n            foreach (var kvp in decisionVars)\n            {\n                var (taskId, personnelId) = kvp.Key;\n                var variable = kvp.Value;\n                \n                // 【核心改进】直接使用预筛选结果中的资质验证结�?\n                var prefilterKey = $\"{taskId}_{personnelId}\";\n                \n                if (context.PrefilterResults.TryGetValue(prefilterKey, out var prefilterResult))\n                {\n                    // 检查预筛选结果中是否包含资质相关的违�?\n                    var hasQualificationViolation = prefilterResult.ConstraintViolations\n                        .Any(violation => violation.Contains(\"资质\") || violation.Contains(\"qualification\"));\n                    \n                    if (hasQualificationViolation)\n                    {\n                        // 硬约束：预筛选发现资质违规，禁止此分�?\n                        var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, 0, $\"prefilter_qualification_{taskId}_{personnelId}\");\n                        constraint.SetCoefficient(variable, 1);\n                        constraintCount++;\n                        \n                        _logger.LogTrace(\"🚫 资质约束应用 - 任务{TaskId}人员{PersonnelId}：{Violations}\", \n                            taskId, personnelId, string.Join(\"; \", prefilterResult.ConstraintViolations.Take(2)));\n                    }\n                }\n                else\n                {\n                    // 【安全保障】无预筛选数据时的后备验�?\n                    var isQualified = await CheckQualificationCompatibilityAsync(taskId, personnelId, context);\n                    if (!isQualified)\n                    {\n                        var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, 0, $\"fallback_qualification_{taskId}_{personnelId}\");\n                        constraint.SetCoefficient(variable, 1);\n                        constraintCount++;\n                        \n                        _logger.LogTrace(\"🚫 后备资质约束应用 - 任务{TaskId}人员{PersonnelId}\", taskId, personnelId);\n                    }\n                }\n            }\n\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"�?资质约束构建完成 - 约束数量：{QualificationConstraintCount}（基于预筛选结果）\", constraintCount);\n            return constraintCount;\n        }\n\n        #endregion\n\n        #region 公平性约�?- 对应遗传算法负载均衡机制\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Inspecting fairness constraints code**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Skip 830 -First 140


Output: {"output":"        /// <summary>\r\n        /// 添加公平性约�?- 对应遗传算法的CalculateFairnessScore和负载均衡机�?\r\n        /// 包含：负载均衡约束、人员利用率约束、过度集中惩罚约�?\r\n        /// </summary>\r\n        private void AddFairnessConstraints(\r\n            Solver solver,\r\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\r\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\r\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n        {\r\n            var constraintCount = 0;\r\n            \r\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"⚖ 开始添加公平性约�?..\");\r\n\r\n            var totalTasks = context.Tasks.Count;\r\n            var totalPersonnel = context.AvailablePersonnel.Count;\r\n            var avgWorkload = (double)totalTasks / totalPersonnel;\r\n\r\n            // 公平性约�?：负载均衡偏差计�?\r\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n            {\r\n                var workloadVarKey = $\"workload_{personnel.Id}\";\r\n                var posDevVarKey = $\"pos_dev_{personnel.Id}\";\r\n                var negDevVarKey = $\"neg_dev_{personnel.Id}\";\r\n\r\n                if (auxiliaryVars.ContainsKey(workloadVarKey) && \r\n                    auxiliaryVars.ContainsKey(posDevVarKey) && \r\n                    auxiliaryVars.ContainsKey(negDevVarKey))\r\n                {\r\n                    // 约束：workload = avgWorkload + pos_deviation - neg_deviation\r\n                    var balanceConstraint = solver.MakeConstraint(avgWorkload, avgWorkload, \r\n                        $\"load_balance_{personnel.Id}\");\r\n                    \r\n                    balanceConstraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[workloadVarKey], 1);\r\n                    balanceConstraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[posDevVarKey], -1);\r\n                    balanceConstraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[negDevVarKey], 1);\r\n                    constraintCount++;\r\n                }\r\n            }\r\n\r\n            // 公平性约�?：最大负载限�?- 防止极端不均�?\r\n            var maxReasonableWorkload = Math.Ceiling(avgWorkload * 1.5);\r\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n            {\r\n                var workloadVarKey = $\"workload_{personnel.Id}\";\r\n                if (auxiliaryVars.ContainsKey(workloadVarKey))\r\n                {\r\n                    var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, maxReasonableWorkload, \r\n                        $\"max_workload_{personnel.Id}\");\r\n                    constraint.SetCoefficient(auxiliaryVars[workloadVarKey], 1);\r\n                    constraintCount++;\r\n                }\r\n            }\r\n\r\n            // 公平性约�?：最小人员利用率约束 - 确保不会过度集中\r\n            var minPersonnelUtilization = totalTasks > 10 ? Math.Max(3, totalPersonnel * 0.4) : 2;\r\n            \r\n            // 创建人员参与指示变量\r\n            var participationVars = new List<Variable>();\r\n            foreach (var personnel in context.AvailablePersonnel)\r\n            {\r\n                var participationVar = solver.MakeBoolVar($\"participation_{personnel.Id}\");\r\n                participationVars.Add(participationVar);\r\n                \r\n                // 如果人员参与，则至少分配1个任�?\r\n                var constraint = solver.MakeConstraint(0, double.PositiveInfinity, \r\n                    $\"participation_min_{personnel.Id}\");\r\n                \r\n                constraint.SetCoefficient(participationVar, -1);\r\n                \r\n                var personnelTasks = decisionVars.Where(v => v.Key.PersonnelId == personnel.Id);\r\n                foreach (var kvp in personnelTasks)\r\n                {\r\n                    constraint.SetCoefficient(kvp.Value, 1);\r\n                }\r\n                constraintCount++;\r\n            }\r\n            \r\n            // 最小参与人数约�?\r\n            var minParticipationConstraint = solver.MakeConstraint(minPersonnelUtilization, double.PositiveInfinity, \r\n                \"min_personnel_utilization\");\r\n            \r\n            foreach (var participationVar in participationVars)\r\n            {\r\n                minParticipationConstraint.SetCoefficient(participationVar, 1);\r\n            }\r\n            constraintCount++;\r\n\r\n            _logger.LogDebug(\"�?公平性约束添加完�?- 约束数量：{ConstraintCount}，平均负载：{AvgWorkload:F2}，最大负载：{MaxWorkload:F2}，最小参与人数：{MinParticipation}\", \r\n                constraintCount, avgWorkload, maxReasonableWorkload, minPersonnelUtilization);\r\n        }\r\n\r\n        #endregion\r\n\r\n        #region 目标函数 - 对应遗传算法适应度函�?\r\n\r\n        /// <summary>\r\n        /// 设置增强版目标函�?- 对应遗传算法的多维度适应度评�?\r\n        /// 目标组成：基础评分 + 约束惩罚 + 公平性奖�?+ 业务优先级奖�?\r\n        /// 权重设计：约束满�?最�? > 公平�?�? > 业务优化(�? > 其他因素(�?\r\n        /// </summary>\r\n        private void SetEnhancedObjectiveFunction(\r\n            Solver solver,\r\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\r\n            Dictionary<string, Variable> auxiliaryVars,\r\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n        {\r\n            var objective = solver.Objective();\r\n            objective.SetMaximization();\r\n            \r\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"🎯 构建增强版多维度目标函数...\");\r\n\r\n            // 目标组件1：基础分配评分 - 基于预筛选结果的质量评分\r\n            AddBaseAssignmentScore(objective, decisionVars, context);\r\n\r\n            // 目标组件2：约束违规惩�?- 对应遗传算法的约束评�?\r\n            AddConstraintViolationPenalties(objective, auxiliaryVars, context);\r\n\r\n            // 目标组件3：公平性奖�?- 对应遗传算法的公平性评�?\r\n            AddFairnessRewards(objective, auxiliaryVars, context);\r\n\r\n            // 目标组件4：业务优先级奖励 - 对应遗传算法的业务逻辑优化\r\n            //AddBusinessPriorityRewards(objective, decisionVars, auxiliaryVars, context);\r\n\r\n            _logger.LogInformation(\"�?增强版目标函数构建完成，包含4大评分维�?);\r\n        }\r\n\r\n        /// <summary>\r\n        /// 添加基础分配评分 - 基于预筛选结果和任务-人员匹配质量\r\n        /// </summary>\r\n        private void AddBaseAssignmentScore(\r\n            Objective objective,\r\n            Dictionary<(long TaskId, long PersonnelId), Variable> decisionVars,\r\n            GlobalAllocationContext context)\r\n        {\r\n            foreach (var kvp in decisionVars)\r\n            {\r\n                var (taskId, personnelId) = kvp.Key;\r\n                var variable = kvp.Value;\r\n                \r\n","metadata":{"exit_code":0,"duration_seconds":0.3}}


**Continuing method implementation**


Get-Content -Path NPP.SmartSchedue.Api\Services\Integration\Algorithms\LinearProgrammingEngine.cs | Select-Object -Skip 920 -First 200